Minor Children and the Law
The Parent Liability Child’s Act refers’s to a parent's obligation to pay for damage done by negligent, intentional, or criminal acts of that parent's child. The act no longer applies when the child reaches the age of majority and does not begin unless the child is between the ages eight and ten. Therefore, when the minor child commits a crime it is the parent’s obligation to pay the consequences of what was done. Despite the facts, there are many reasons why the parents should not accept the consequences of what was done by their minor child.
Breaking the law involves consequences, and those consequences are only served to those who do the crime, such as minor children. If they do the crime they need to do the time, no matter how old. Children such as minors know the difference between right and wrong. Children today who do commit these crimes are getting let off too easily. Many court systems in our country today have out the blame on the parents. These parents are law abiding citizens, who would give their lives for their children. However the court continues to direct the crime to the parents, and sends them to jail. Meanwhile, the children who have committed the crime are sent home.
For decades, civil liability laws held parents somewhat responsible for the actions of their children. They either pay program fees related to juvenile courts or corrections. For example, Idaho, Indiana, and New Hampshire passed laws in 1995 making parents pay for the care of their children confined in juvenile facilities. In Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, New Hampshire, North Dakota, and Virginia, parents are responsible for victim restitution. Some states, such as Rhode Island and Texas, require parents to participate with their children in counseling or education programs and at court hearings. Parents have always been held liable, to a certain extent that is, for their children's actions in the United States. Some of the early parental liability statutes provided the juvenile court system jurisdiction over parents who had contributed to the delinquency of a minor. Parents are an influence over their child, but if a child commits murder whether, it was planned out or not, should be tried as an adult. A child who is under the age of eighteen would be placed in a specialized facility with others of his or her age, apart from the adults. After a certain age they would be transferred to the adult facility.
It is however, the responsibility of an adult to constantly stay on top of things involving their children. Minor children are not old enough to accept adult consequences, so it is taken up to the parents to be resolved. If the parents are blamed then what is being done to the minor who acctually doing the crime? What will keep them from doing it again and the parents suffering, nothing.
Some of us have committed a crime in our youth. Maybe it was stealing a candy bar from the neighborhood store or stealing your parent’s car for a joy ride at age sixteen. In the end it was the person who committed the crime to accept punishment, so why change the acceptance of punishment whether the crime was small or large? You should not change it. It is a person’s free will to do what he or she pleases knowing that consequences are involved depending what the action was. So for preteens and adolescents who do adult crimes should pay the adult price.
Parents should not be responsible for their children’s actions involving crimes. Children have the mentality to determine what is right and wrong. No matter what their age and the type of crime committed, they should accept the full punishment. Their actions were caused by their own will and not the parents.
“Parent Liability Child’s Act.” Encyclopedia of Everyday Law. Ed. Shirelle Phelps. Gale Cenage, 2003. eNotes.com. 2006. 24 Sep, 2010
<http://www.enotes.com/everyday-law-encyclopedia/parent-liability-child-s-act>